|
Size: 2855
Comment: typo and fixed links
|
Size: 5016
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
We should try to keep each point as short as possible. These arguments should be a resource for people who want to approach a school, teacher, or related body to ask them to use Free Software. |
We should try to keep each point as short as possible. These arguments should be a resource for people who want to approach a school, teacher, or related body to ask them to use Free Software. |
| Line 10: | Line 9: |
| Schools should teach children to help each other and to share with each other. With proprietary software, teachers are required to prevent such sharing and to tell the children that sharing of useful software is wrong. Using free software allows schools to set a better example and teach children to share. | Schools should teach children to help each other and to share with each other. With proprietary software, teachers are required to prevent such sharing and to tell the children that sharing of useful software is wrong. Using free software allows schools to set a better example and teach children to share and cooperate. |
| Line 13: | Line 12: |
| With free software, teachers can give a copy to each student. Thus parents are not put in a position of making a financial decision, and children of families with less financial resources can learn with the same tools as every other child. | With free software, teachers can give a copy to each student. Thus parents are not put in a position of making a financial decision, and children of families with less financial resources can learn with the same tools as every other child. |
| Line 16: | Line 15: |
| Some children will be interested in how software works, and some will be interested in writing software. When a school uses Free Software, they are in a position to help interested children learn about computers to any depth. | Some children will be interested in how software works, and some will be interested in writing software. When a school uses Free Software, they are in a position to help interested children learn about computers to any depth. The possibility/freedom to tinker motivates children to learn more. == Learning to use software == Nowadays, it is not enough to know how to use a certain office program. Young employees need the capability to adopt to any software. It's important to understand the concept of a Software, not the usage of a particular application. The variety of Free Software products teaches exactly this. For a better understanding, a comparison of different concepts (e.g. Lyx/LaTex vs. Open Office) is invaluable. Free Software permits students to learn how software works and thus how they can make the best use of it. A key skill, demanded by employers. |
| Line 19: | Line 25: |
| If children learn to do things a certain way in school, the easiest way for them to do that thing in their adult life is to continue to do it the same way. If schools teach children to rely on proprietary software, they are giving the child a dependency on something which they have to pay for and which generally discourages sharing and good will in society. However, if a school teaches children to rely on Free Software, the software can never be taken away from the child (even in the child's adult life) and the child can continue using this software while helping others by sharing it. | If children learn to do things a certain way in school, the easiest way for them to do that thing in their adult life is to continue to do it the same way. If schools teach children to rely on proprietary software, they are giving the child a dependency on something which they have to pay for and which generally discourages sharing and good will in society. However, if a school teaches children to rely on Free Software, the software can never be taken away from the child (even in the child's adult life) and the child can continue using this software while helping others by sharing it. Using and teaching Free Software also makes the school itself independent from any commercial interests |
| Line 22: | Line 30: |
| == No trouble with licenses == With Free Software, there are no worries about expiry dates or costs of the licenses. Free Software stays free in every sense. There is no risk to mislead any child to use an illegal copy (see also: "Equality at home"). == Easy to administer == There are several ready-to-use solutions for many use-cases in educational scenarios. Maintenance of Free Software systems is highly automated and hence timesaving. Security and other updates can be implemented in a minute. Free Software is stable, secure and reliable. == Better use of funds == Free Software can save the school money. Since there are no license charges, the money can be use to train the teachers or for technical support to disburden the teachers. == Better use of old hardware == Free Software can be used with minimal hardware requirements on almost any hardware. Thus, it saves money again. == learning in native language == Free Software applications are being translated into almost any language (even into those where a translation could not be afforded by a proprietary software developer). Thus each child can learn and focus on the actual subject without any language barriers. |
|
| Line 24: | Line 48: |
| * [[Implementing Free Software usage policy]] * [[Free_Software_usage_in_schools | Free Software usage in schools]] * [[Reasons_for_public_administration_to_use_Free_Software |Reasons for public administration to use Free Software]] |
* [[Implementing_Free_Software_usage_policy]] * [[Free_Software_usage_in_schools|Free Software usage in schools]] * [[Reasons_for_public_administration_to_use_Free_Software|Reasons for public administration to use Free Software]] |
| Line 30: | Line 54: |
| * [[http://fsfeurope.org/documents/rms-fs-2006-03-09.en.html#free-software-and-schools | Richard Stallman talking about this during another talk]] * [[http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/transcript_richard_stallman_honorary_degree_speech_pavia_2007 | Stallman's acceptance speech for an honorary degree in Pavia]] * [[http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/transcript_of_rms_at_wsis_on_is_free_open_source_software_the_answer#wsis--schools-and-proprietary-software | Stallman talks about the WSIS development agenda]] |
* [[http://fsfeurope.org/documents/rms-fs-2006-03-09.en.html#free-software-and-schools|Richard Stallman talking about this during another talk]] * [[http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/transcript_richard_stallman_honorary_degree_speech_pavia_2007|Stallman's acceptance speech for an honorary degree in Pavia]] * [[http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/transcript_of_rms_at_wsis_on_is_free_open_source_software_the_answer#wsis--schools-and-proprietary-software|Stallman talks about the WSIS development agenda]] * http://www.salzburg.luga.or.at/linux_in_der_schule.html Argumentation pro Free Software in German (GFDL) * http://www.donau-uni.ac.at/de/aktuell/presse/archiv/05610/index.php |
| Line 35: | Line 60: |
CategoryReasonsfor CategoryEducation |
CategoryReasonsfor CategoryEducation CategoryAdvocacy |
Contents
Schools should teach children to be good members of the community, and schools should not provide product training for companies that do not respect freedom.
Arguments
We should try to keep each point as short as possible. These arguments should be a resource for people who want to approach a school, teacher, or related body to ask them to use Free Software.
Sharing
Schools should teach children to help each other and to share with each other. With proprietary software, teachers are required to prevent such sharing and to tell the children that sharing of useful software is wrong. Using free software allows schools to set a better example and teach children to share and cooperate.
Equality at home
With free software, teachers can give a copy to each student. Thus parents are not put in a position of making a financial decision, and children of families with less financial resources can learn with the same tools as every other child.
Learning to program
Some children will be interested in how software works, and some will be interested in writing software. When a school uses Free Software, they are in a position to help interested children learn about computers to any depth.
The possibility/freedom to tinker motivates children to learn more.
Learning to use software
Nowadays, it is not enough to know how to use a certain office program. Young employees need the capability to adopt to any software. It's important to understand the concept of a Software, not the usage of a particular application. The variety of Free Software products teaches exactly this. For a better understanding, a comparison of different concepts (e.g. Lyx/LaTex vs. Open Office) is invaluable. Free Software permits students to learn how software works and thus how they can make the best use of it. A key skill, demanded by employers.
Dependency
If children learn to do things a certain way in school, the easiest way for them to do that thing in their adult life is to continue to do it the same way. If schools teach children to rely on proprietary software, they are giving the child a dependency on something which they have to pay for and which generally discourages sharing and good will in society. However, if a school teaches children to rely on Free Software, the software can never be taken away from the child (even in the child's adult life) and the child can continue using this software while helping others by sharing it.
Using and teaching Free Software also makes the school itself independent from any commercial interests
No trouble with licenses
With Free Software, there are no worries about expiry dates or costs of the licenses. Free Software stays free in every sense. There is no risk to mislead any child to use an illegal copy (see also: "Equality at home").
Easy to administer
There are several ready-to-use solutions for many use-cases in educational scenarios. Maintenance of Free Software systems is highly automated and hence timesaving. Security and other updates can be implemented in a minute.
Free Software is stable, secure and reliable.
Better use of funds
Free Software can save the school money. Since there are no license charges, the money can be use to train the teachers or for technical support to disburden the teachers.
Better use of old hardware
Free Software can be used with minimal hardware requirements on almost any hardware. Thus, it saves money again.
learning in native language
Free Software applications are being translated into almost any language (even into those where a translation could not be afforded by a proprietary software developer). Thus each child can learn and focus on the actual subject without any language barriers.
Related pages
Sources for further information
http://fsfeurope.org/projects/education/argumentation.en.html
Stallman's acceptance speech for an honorary degree in Pavia
http://www.salzburg.luga.or.at/linux_in_der_schule.html Argumentation pro Free Software in German (GFDL)
http://www.donau-uni.ac.at/de/aktuell/presse/archiv/05610/index.php